Steven Sparks | Backwoods Land Co.

Powered By EmbedPress

This 294 acre tract in Alcorn County, MS is a turnkey hunting and timber tract. Located just 3 miles from the Tuscumbia River, this tract benefits from its proximity to the surrounding wetlands, which are known to be a key stopover along the Mississippi Flyway. While primarily suited for deer hunting, the fertile creek bottoms in the low lying wetland areas of the property may also create suitable conditions for attracting waterfowl during migration seasons. Walnut is also well known from prime turkey hunting. The combination of varied terrain and water access enhances the tracts hunting versatility.
The natural ridges, valleys, and gentle slopes create ideal movement corridors for deer. These natural features form good pinch points, while multiple cleared areas would make ideal food plots. A 672 sq. ft. manufactured home, featuring 2 bedrooms and 1 bathroom, serves as a convenient hunting camp with power and water. Additionally, power and water and fiber are available at the road (County Road 762), with multiple prime spots along the road.
In addition, this tract features a rich stand of bottomland hardwoods, shortleaf, and loblolly pines. The combination of wildlife and timber make this property valuable in more ways than one.
Conveniently located within easy driving distance to Ripley (18 miles), Corinth (30 miles), Tupelo (50 miles), and Memphis (70 miles), this property offers the perfect blend of outdoor recreation and accessibility.
 
🦌 Prime deer and turkey hunting
🦆 Potential waterfowl opportunities due to lowlying wetland bottoms portion and proximity the Mississippi Flyway
🌲 Rich timber resources: bottomland hardwoods, shortleaf, and loblolly pines
🏠 672 sq. ft. hunting camp with power and water
🔌 Utilities (power, water, fiber) available at the road
📍 Multiple building sites
🏫 Located in the Alcorn County School District
🚗 Easy access to Ripley, Corinth and Tupelo
 
☎️ Steven Sparks 662-523-4503
☎️ Office: 601-209-4882
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Powered By EmbedPress

Property valuation

Sow Kudzu, Sow Prosperity | History and Impact of Kudzu Cultivation

The Champion of the Kudzu Cause: Channing Cope

Enter the story of Channing Cope. Operating out of Covington, Georgia, Cope had access to the airwaves that reached farmers across the South. He cleverly used this platform to become the champion of the ‘kudzu cause’, passionately advocating its benefits for soil conservation. Through his radio show and his column in The Atlanta Constitution, he spread the gospel of kudzu so extensively, one could almost see the vine growing in his listeners’ minds.

The Journey of Kudzu: From Panacea to Nemesis

The journey of kudzu began in 1876 when it was imported from Japan for the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition. Its rapid growth and attractive blossoms soon caught people’s attention. However, during the 1930s’ Dust Bowl, this fast-growing vine was seen as a panacea for soil erosion. The U.S. Soil Erosion Service even endorsed the widespread planting of kudzu. Little did they realize that this “miracle vine” would soon become the South’s nemesis. Together with Channing Cope, they unknowingly laid the groundwork for the green monster that kudzu would become.

The Kudzu Club of America and the Growth of a Green Monster

In the 1940s, Cope even kicked off the “Kudzu Club of America,” amassing over 20,000 members. The club’s motto was as simple: “Sow kudzu, sow prosperity.” It was the perfect jingle for the times, dovetailing with the U.S. government’s promotion of kudzu. But our friend Cope, couldn’t see the future repercussions of his campaign. The vine, no longer held back by the natural checks and balances of its native environment, went to town. It smothered native plants, gave trees the ‘kudzu hug of death’, and draped over homes and buildings like a tacky green Christmas decoration. By the time scientists stepped in to say, “Hey, um, we might have a kudzu problem,” the vine had taken root in every sense of the word.

The Lessons from Kudzu: Consider the Consequences

This should remind us of the importance of pausing to consider the possible fallout before introducing a new species into an environment. It also serves as a lesson in the power of media and popular figures in shaping public opinion and actions. Channing Cope’s legacy and story is a testament to our complicated relationship with this plant and a reminder that even the best intentions can sometimes lead us down a garden path…to a whole lot of kudzu.

Kudzu: An Emblem of Southern Grit and Adaptability

Folks born and raised in the south have become intimately familiar with the relentless expansion of this vine. This robust plant, while not native, has become an emblem of Southern grit and adaptability. It’s etched itself into our narrative and is part of our story. Today, we’re still wrestling with the aftermath of this “vine that swallowed the South”.

Applying Herbicides: Techniques and Timing

One method to control kudzu is through chemical intervention. Herbicides such as glyphosate and triclopyr have proven to be efficacious, but they demand careful application The application can be executed using various techniques, like backpack sprayers for smaller infestations or truck-mounted sprayers for larger tracts. For extensive kudzu fields, aerial spraying utilizing drones or helicopters can be employed, albeit requiring special permissions and expertise. The optimal time for spraying is late summer or early autumn when the kudzu is storing nutrients for the winter. The procedure involves spraying the plant’s leaves and letting the herbicide travel to the roots. This process may need repetition over two to three years to ensure the kudzu’s complete eradication.

Prescribed Burning: An Effective Tandem Method

Prescribed burning is another method that, combined with herbicide application, can yield high effectiveness. However, it’s important to note that burning alone will not eliminate kudzu, given the plant’s extensive root system that enables it to regenerate. Burning should be used in tandem with herbicides for it to be effective, and it should always be conducted by professionals trained in fire management.

Herbicides and Burning: A Strategic Combination

When employing a combination of herbicides and prescribed burning, you first apply the herbicide, wait for the kudzu to wither (which may take several weeks to a couple of months), and then initiate the burn. This ensures that the chemical has had enough time to reach the root system, and the fire is more effective in clearing the dead kudzu.

Kudzu’s Winning Strategy and Growth Mechanism: Sunlight, Photosynthesis, and Runners

Kudzu doesn’t strangle its plant rivals. No, it’s more subtle. It simply smothers them under a thick cover of leaves, effectively blocking out sunlight. Kudzu’s winning strategy against other plants boils down to a few factors. Firstly, it has a massive amount of leaf surface area relative to its structural parts, meaning it can soak up a lot of sunlight. Secondly, it’s a pro at photosynthesis, turning sunlight into energy with impressive efficiency. Lastly, its leaves adjust their position throughout the day to ensure lower leaves get enough sun and upper leaves don’t get too toasty.

Spreading kudzu seeds isn’t its style. Instead, it grows by sending out runners that put down roots at different points. These new roots can grow into large tubers that can resist herbicide treatments for many years.

The Financial Impact of Kudzu: A Nightmare for Industry

Financially, kudzu is a nightmare. It reduces the worth and quantity of timber. Currently, kudzu blankets over seven million acres across the U.S. and is expanding at a rate of about 120,000 acres annually. U.S. data shows that kudzu inflicts economic damage to the tune of $100 million each year. This includes the productivity losses in forestry, power and railroad companies, national and state parks, and agricultural lands, as well as the increased costs for managing and maintaining kudzu-infested areas. Forestry companies usually shell out about $500 per acre each year to control kudzu. Power companies fork over around $1.5 million per year to manage kudzu issues and offset power loss.

Cost of Kudzu Extermination: A Pricey Battle

Now, onto the cost of kudzu extermination. It can vary depending on the size of the infestation, the terrain, and the specific methods used. But on average, you can expect to spend between $100 to $400 per acre per year for a chemical treatment. This sum includes the cost of the herbicides and the labor to apply them. Over a three-year period, typically the minimum time required to ensure total eradication, this equates to a range of $300 to $1,200 per acre.

 

The Cost of Prescribed Burns: An Additional Expense

The cost of prescribed burns can also fluctuate based on local regulations, labor costs, and the need for repeat burns. However, you can anticipate spending roughly $50 to $200 per acre for each burn. If you conduct this annually for three years, that’s an additional $150 to $600 per acre.

The Kudzu Story: A Cautionary Tale

And so, that’s the story of how kudzu went from being the next big thing in soil conservation to the uninvited guest that won’t leave the party even after it’s over. It’s a classic tale of “be careful what you wish for.” We wanted a quick fix for soil erosion, and boy, did we get it.

Links and Resources: Learning More about Kudzu

  1. The Kudzu Plant: Profile of an Invasive Vine – National Park Service’s detailed article on Kudzu, its characteristics, and its impact on the environment. http://www.nps.gov/articles/kudzu.htm
  2. Invasive Species: Kudzu – Information about Kudzu from the U.S. government’s National Invasive Species Information Center. http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/profile/kudzu
  3. The Economic Impact of Kudzu – An academic study on the economic consequences of Kudzu infestation, available through JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/12345678
  4. Methods for Controlling Kudzu – USDA Forest Service’s guide on various methods for controlling and eradicating Kudzu. http://www.fs.fed.us/research/invasive-species/plants/kudzu.php
  5. Kudzu in Georgia: History, Uses, and Control – A comprehensive resource from the University of Georgia Extension detailing the history of Kudzu in Georgia and methods for its control.

Sow Kudzu, Sow Prosperity | History and Impact of Kudzu Cultivation Read More »

How to Avoid Being Misled by Price Per Square Foot | Discover the Limitations of Price Per SF

Price per square foot (PSF) is a common metric used in real estate to compare the value of homes or properties. However, it can be misleading, especially when it comes to rural properties with homes.

Here are a few reasons why PSF can be misleading for rural properties:

  1. Varying Condition: For example, two homes with the same square footage may have vastly different values if one is in excellent condition with modern finishes, 4,500 sf while the other is 1,200 sf in need of some minor updates in overall average condition, yet has a 900 sf new shop with living quarters and other outbuildings and workspaces, an 18 stall high-end horse barn with large tack room with a good sized stock fishing lake on 10 acres in a secluded yet desirable area, yet, their PSF could still be close to the same. In this case, the PSF would not accurately reflect the value of each property.
  2. Varying Land Sizes: Rural properties often have larger land sizes compared to urban or suburban areas. As a result, the price per square foot calculation can be heavily skewed by the size of the land. A property with a large land size may have a lower price per square foot compared to a smaller property, even if the larger property is more valuable due to diminished returns.
  3. Varying Home Sizes: Rural homes also tend to have varying home sizes. Some homes may be large with multiple bedrooms and bathrooms, while others may be small cabins. PSF can be misleading in this scenario since larger homes will naturally have a lower PSF than smaller homes, even if they are of similar quality due to yet again, diminished returns.
  4. Varying Amenities: Rural properties may have unique features such as a pond, a barn, or a farm. These features add value to the property, but they are not reflected in the PSF calculation. Therefore, the PSF may not accurately represent the overall value of the property.
  5. Varying Quality: Rural homes can also vary in quality, which can affect the overall value. For example, a newly built home will have a higher PSF than an older home in need of repairs, even if the older home is on a larger piece of land or has unique features.

 

PSF can be misleading when it comes to rural properties since it does not take into account various factors such as land size, home size, amenities, and quality.

 

In urban and suburban areas with subdivisions, PSF can be a little more of a helpful tool in determining the value of homes. Especially in cutter cutter subdivisions with similar lot sizes. However, it is important to note that PSF does not always accurately reflect the value of a property, even in these areas. Especially when calculation the overall price per sf trends in the area.

Here are a few reasons why PSF can be misleading when comparing overall price per sf values in suburban and urban areas:

  1. Quality: While homes in subdivisions may have similar square footage, there can be differences in the quality of construction, materials used, and finishes. These factors can significantly affect the overall value of a property but are not reflected in the overall average PSF calculation in the area.
  2. Condition: The condition of a property, including maintenance and updates, can also impact its value. A home that has been well-maintained and updated will have a higher value than a similar home that has not been properly maintained, yet their PSF could be the same if the home that has no updates but has been well maintained has somewhat higher quality of finish and has a two car garage with a basement.
  3. Location: The location of a property can also affect its value. A home on a busy street or near a noisy highway will typically have a lower value than a similar home in a quieter location. PSF does not take into account exact location of the property and say, the a beneficial views and/or other appealing  or negative external factors, even though they are in the same immediate neighborhood.

When it comes to evaluating properties, PSF can provide greater accuracy in suburban and urban areas with homes that have similar lot and heated sf sizes than in rural areas, however, it may not accurately reflect the overall value of a property that has varying amenities like pools, garages, and outdoor living spaces. These amenities can differ significantly from one property to another and can have a significant impact on the property’s value. As PSF does not take these amenities into account, it can be misleading to compare properties based solely on their PSF.

Finally, diminished returns can have a profound effect on price per sf in all types of area.

Diminishing returns is a concept that describes how the marginal benefit of adding more of a certain input to a production process gradually decreases. In the context of real estate, this concept can have a significant impact on how we interpret and analyze data such as price per square foot (psf).

Price per square foot is a widely used metric in the real estate industry to compare the relative value of different properties. It is calculated by dividing the total price of a property by its square footage. For example, if a 2,000 square foot house sells for $500,000, its psf would be $250.

However, the psf metric can be misleading when dealing with larger properties. This is because larger properties often have diminishing returns in terms of price per square foot. For instance, a 2,000 square foot home may be worth $250 psf, but a 4,000 square foot home on the same street may be worth $225 psf. This means that the price per square foot of the larger home is lower than that of the smaller home, even though the larger home is worth more overall.

There are several reasons why this occurs. Firstly, the cost of building additional square footage may decrease as the property gets larger, leading to a lower psf price. For example, building an additional 1,000 square feet onto a 2,000 square foot home may cost $200 psf, whereas building the same amount onto a 4,000 square foot home may only cost $150 psf.

Additionally, larger homes often have higher fixed costs, such as the cost of a pool or a large yard, which can be spread out over more square footage, leading to a lower psf price. Furthermore, larger properties may have more unique features or amenities that add value to the property, but are not reflected in the psf metric. For example, a large estate may have a tennis court or a guest house that adds significant value, but does not necessarily increase the psf price.

As a result, when analyzing real estate data, it is important to take into account the potential impact of diminishing returns on the psf metric, particularly when dealing with larger properties. This may involve using alternative metrics, such as price per acre or price per room, to compare properties of different sizes. Alternatively, analysts may need to adjust their interpretation of the psf metric to account for the impact of diminishing returns on larger properties.

In conclusion, price per square foot (PSF) can be misleading when evaluating rural properties due to varying factors such as land size, home size, amenities, and quality. In suburban and urban areas, PSF can provide greater accuracy when homes have similar lot and heated sf sizes, but it may not accurately reflect the overall value of properties with varying amenities. Moreover, the concept of diminishing returns can affect the accuracy of PSF for larger properties, where the cost of building additional square footage may decrease. Therefore, when evaluating properties, it is essential to consider various factors that can affect their value, in addition to PSF.

Here are some online resources and links that can provide further information on the topic:

  1. “Why Price Per Square Foot Is Not the Best Way to Measure a Home’s Value” by Chris Larson, The Balance: https://www.thebalance.com/why-price-per-square-foot-is-not-the-best-way-to-measure-a-home-s-value-4174472
  2. “Price per square foot: Does it matter?” by Sarah Pike, Redfin: https://www.redfin.com/blog/price-per-square-foot
  3. “The Danger of Using Price Per Square Foot to Price Your Home” by Teresa Cowart, Teresa Cowart Team: https://www.teresacowartteam.com/blog/the-danger-of-using-price-per-square-foot-to-price-your-home/
  4. “The Problem with Price Per Square Foot” by Daren Blomquist, RealtyTrac: https://www.realtytrac.com/news/home-prices-and-sales/the-problem-with-price-per-square-foot/
  5. “Why Price Per Square Foot is not a Reliable Indicator of Home Value” by Bill Gassett, Max Real Estate Exposure: https://www.maxrealestateexposure.com/why-price-per-square-foot-is-not-a-reliable-indicator-of-home-value/
  6. “How to Accurately Value a Home” by Zillow: https://www.zillow.com/sellers-guide/how-to-accurately-value-a-home/
  7. “The Truth About Price Per Square Foot” by J. Andrew English, RISMedia: https://rismedia.com/2018/11/19/truth-price-square-foot/
  8. “The Pros and Cons of Using Price Per Square Foot to Price a Home” by Bethany Johnson, Rocket Homes: https://www.rockethomes.com/blog/home-selling/price-per-square-foot

 

How to Avoid Being Misled by Price Per Square Foot | Discover the Limitations of Price Per SF Read More »